Nice Guys?

We are all gathered in that dead time zone: Saturday night, drizzle outside, nice warm sofa and nice supermarket curry burning a hole into impetus to move. We are staring at Apple TV menus.  It is a ritual: we are all film fans.  I hold the buttons, but always make concessions to the younger bretheren.  I want to watch ‘Son of Saul’ – but 15 year old says

‘Not a fucking Holocaust movie.’  I then zap to foreign movies and show them the preview of a French romantic comedy about a really short guy going out with a tall blonde.  When you’re talking over the preview to work out how they did it –

Me: ‘Green screen?’

Son: ‘CGI. They put his head on a short guy’s body, look…’ then you know the movie is done for, as far as this family is concerned.  There was a look of slight shock that they’d do that to a short guy.  There is another Holocaust movie with Cillian Murphy and Jamie Dornan, but 15 year old says

‘Dad needs to laugh. He’s feeling down.’  Which = ‘I need a laugh because I’m 15 and I don’t want to watch your stupid Holocaust movies.’

Last time we were in this zone, I conceded and we watched ‘Spy’ starring Melissa McCarthy.  I said after

‘NEVER AGAIN.  I am never watching a Hollywood movie again!’  The random, mad killing, the idiocy of the jokes, the single hero’s journey through the movie… I couldn’t do it.  So we’re at a crux point where we should really move to the DVD cupboard and hoist out a Hitchcock, or a 50’s musical, or a Cary Grant.  But because I am weak, we rent ‘Nice Guys’, starring Russell Crowe and Ryan Gosling.

It is a 1970s-set private detective yarn, with lots of laughs.  It has many gags, and lashings of whisky drinking, cigarette smoking capery.  They beat up on each other regularly, and Ryan Gosling has a daughter who looks ten but is apparently 13, who drives his vintage open topped Merc for him, and turns up at all the set pieces in order to provide him with an innocent to rescue.  The family all roar with laughter throughout.  I am not inured to a little bit of slapstick, so I laugh along, but about two thirds through, I find it all a little dull and start to nod off.  It is too long, as all these action Hollywood movies are, and after a wee -break, I am fully awake for the denouement.

This morning, I wake to the full horror of what that movie was about.  You have two, down on their luck, white males walking through glamorous parties, searching for a porn star beauty on behalf of her older, in government, bitter, twisted Mom.  The two males shoot and fight their way through most scenes, taking guns out very early on, and accidentally killing people who are then not accounted for at all.  It has become a trope in Hollywood movies such as this and ‘Spy’ to utilise the mass killing of super hero movies as part of the entertainment.  This sits very badly with me.  If each death is part of the entertainment, and in fact, often laughable, then how are we expecting the youth whose culture this is, to understand that death is real, that killing a person is always killing someone with family, with background, with worth?  Dr Robert Hare, in an article about the Columbine killings, says this:

None of his victims means anything to the psychopath. He recognizes other people only as means to obtain what he desires. Not only does he feel no guilt for destroying their lives, he doesn’t grasp what they feel. The truly hard-core psychopath doesn’t quite comprehend emotions like love or hate or fear, because he has never experienced them directly.‘ (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/assessment/2004/04/the_depressive_and_the_psychopath.html)

In the movie, Russell Crowe is seen to kill, early on, a villain who has been chasing him.  The guy, a strange, goofy man who could be lightly called ‘a weirdo’, with dark, long hair, is hit by a truck.  While lying in the road, the child goes over and holds his hand.  Russell Crowe sends her off to flag down a car to help.  While she is away, he kills the guy by strangling him.  Later, when he is about to do this act again at the denoument, with another villain, the epiphany comes: the 13 year old says ‘You don’t have to do this!’ and Russell Crowe stops himself, saying ‘Congratulations…a 13 year old saved your life.’  The people Crowe and Gosling are fighting are either weirdos, dark haired, or black, incidentally.

I am reading a fascinating book: ‘KL: A History of the Nazi Concentration Camps’ by Nikolaus Wachsmann.  Right from the beginning, in 1933, there were camps in Berlin – 170 of them – of varying degrees of brutality.  It is clear that Nazism grew out of a grassroots movement of lack of education, victimhood and hysteria.  The reaction of every person who was detained was to give some sort of account of what happened.  One man, very early on – Fritz Solmitz, a Social Democratic journalist, was treated brutally, and reacted y writing an account of this brutality on cigarette papers, which he hid in his watch.  He was murdered fourteen days after his detention.  The point here is – the way that he controlled what happened to him was – he was in control of the story.  The truth of his history is preserved.

So, sure, what we watched last night was just a movie, right?  What am I carping about?  Let me ask you this: if each young mind watching that movie thinks – ‘there is an element of truth in what I am watching’, what are we selling to them?  We are selling them a singular journey of two white males who see themselves as victims within their own lives.  In order to survive within their world, they must battle and kill many bad people who come at them with knives, bombs and guns.  They must be brutal and not care about the victims.  The Columbine killers, it is claimed by one of their mothers, Sue Klebold, were copycatting a movie: ‘Natural Born Killers’. (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/14/mother-supposed-know-son-columbine-sue-klebold)

So what do we do about this?  Our family are going to stop watching the movies, for sure.  That is a good first step, as far as I’m concerned.  We bring to the attention of 15 year olds and 17 year olds that the movie they have just watched has fatal, terrible, flaws.  (On another matter: the movie has a scene where the 13 year old is introduced to a porn movie by one of its stars: a classic grooming technique.  All the time, she is at the mercy of older women and men of questionable character – because, it’s the 70s! That’s what it was like!  I was there.  It was like that.  Except, it wasn’t funny.  And rarely was there a father figure rescuing the smart, sassy girl.)

If you think clearly about what has happened in the recent months in the USA: you have a white male who feels down on his luck, rallying crowds by telling them he will lock up the villains who look different than him.  He’ll throw them out, or build a wall.  He’ll not allow the brown, different religions in.  When someone disagreed with him at one of his rallies, he watched gleefully as they were beaten up.  His singular journey as the hero of his story is what he sells to other white males: we have been down trodden, and we will be great again.  The movie last night had Kim Basinger thwarted in her attempt to win, the incumbent governor brought down by her own corruption.

Soldiers are suffering from PTSD, working in the Pentagon because they are droning ‘the enemy’ in places like Afghanistan – those inverted commas because they are often killing civilians, often women and children.  Those soldiers are judge, jury, executor – and historian.  The people they kill do not give eyewitness accounts.  Similarly, in other war zones, it is becoming clearer that international humanitarian rules of war are becoming murkier.

A movie like last nights can’t possibly have an affect can it?  And yet, there are shootings all the time in the states.  A man takes his gun out of his checked bag at Fort Lauderdale and shoots five people, wounding eight more.  The terrorism attacks across Europe by young men who often grow up in the west, cannot only be down to a misplaced idealism and religiosity that has nothing to do with Islam?  If you see it in what you watch and what you play onscreen, surely it must be easier to carry out?

And this brings me to this question:  what is art for?  A stupid movie like ‘Nice Guys’ is art, I’m afraid – it is someone’s interpretation of a story, and of deeper truths of the human condition.  What I saw was a movie about psychopaths. A small step toward making the unacceptable acceptable.  It is strange, and wild to imagine that we have come to this point in our human existence – that killing and hurting is watchable, funny entertainment.  We’re an intelligent, liberal family, and we guffawed.  I mean, we laughed so hard we were finding it difficult to draw breath at times.  The bitterest pill can be swallowed with sugar: the moral is, be careful about what pill you swallow.  Be careful it isn’t poison.

 

On madness

On the common this morning, 7.50am, I heard a woman’s voice shout:

‘I DON’T CARE ABOUT UKIP OR DONALD TRUMP! I want to live my life with kindness and integrity! Now stop!’

And I realised it was me.  Shouting at my husband.  Because once the debate starts, you feel the squashed down frustration rise within you, and when its raining, and you passed up a half hour of peaceful meditation at home in the warm in order to be with the person you love and spend some quality time with them walking across the dank, fog laden pasture, only for them to start fulminating about the world’s crises, and you have brain freeze: of course, you’re going to shout.  Like a child. Like a pushed-up-against-the-wall arsehole.

After I shouted, the wind took my words, as wind often does, and sprinkled them around me as I walked, so that they kept coming back and smashing me in the face with the  ice rain.  I try not to shout often.  I laugh, I sing, I tell loud stories.  But shouting and anger are things I avoid.  Shouting is an ineffective method of communicating one’s feelings.  And it is destructive.  When I think of it, when I really look at myself doing it, it is simply a construct of fear, and of unhappiness.  It is not my real person.  It is the person who feels under attack, and must attack back.  The animal self.  And this is a sort of madness.  We are all going mad, I think, because we are all under attack.

This year has been a perfect storm of outcomes.  A lot of our heroes died: that feels like an attack on our emotions that goes deeper than a bereavement for a relative.  If you think of Bowie dying, you think of parts of your memory stream dying with him: the feelings he gave you are personal highs to do with identity and love.  I heard the John Lennon Christmas song in a shop the other day and teared up – I still miss John, and love him with a tender place in my heart.  Famous people dying is always hard because we want ownership of the tragedy.  But its everyone’s, and no ones – you don’t want to seem gauche and over the top, so you are quiet, sad, you say goodbye to something of yourself, and you shoulder the bag of responsibility and being grown up, and move on.

We had a referendum, and the US had an election.  Both of these were funnelled through to us by a media stream more and more marginalised by factions on both sides of the arguments: and the politicians, being the sort of people who would want to become leaders, used this to their advantage.  They manipulated and lied and strutted about like fighting cockerels, and we were asked to choose, based on – not the facts, God forbid – but on personalities and the best lies that were told.  We were the audience in a talent show where the talent was for mendacity.  And the end result?  People die.  Across the world, but also in our back yard.  Everything in the world is reverberating out in concentric circles around a crater-like epicentre: Aleppo.  And another: Yemen.  There are others, and others.  And even here, in Great Britain, we have a small crater: Birstall, West Yorkshire, where Jo Cox MP was killed.

The politicians and the media told us that there was no one representing the poor.  And the poor and the middle incomes and the far right all rose up and voted for revenge, against an imagined status quo that was damaging them: the immigrants, the weird bogeymen who will take their livelihoods.  And who did they vote in? Millionaires, over here.  Billionaires in the US.  Because of course, they will understand what it is to live out of a food bank. There is no one representing anyone, I think.  We are all still reeling in shock, and going mad with anxiety and grief and sadness for our countries and our world.  But, if you follow through my journey this morning to its end: there is hope.  I continued to walk through the rain, husband and dogs by my side, and the rain beat down and gave us both brain freeze.  We came home, boiled the kettle and drank tea.  We were silent and forgiving of each other.  It is what our world needs.  We need to give ourselves silence.  We need to drink tea and forgive.

Full disclosure: I work for a charity once a week, and sit on its committee.  I give three hours a week to listen to people who are suffering. I do this because – it is the least I can do.  I went towards it a year and a half ago because I was sick of sitting in my warm house and not doing anything.  I was sick of myself and my inertia and my despair at the world.  Putting the world to rights should not be something we do at home, while drinking tea in our warm houses.  It can be done by engaging with the community – by being in the world.  It is the best part of my week.  It is the best thing I do in my life. My fellow volunteers are the dearest people, friends I value highly.  It is how I counter my own madness and the madness that attacks me in the world.

I have gotten rid of my iphone this week and gone back to a phone that takes calls and texts only.  I limit my news to glancing at the headlines on the BBC website in the morning, reading an independent newspaper which states its need to be as non partisan as possible only occasionally, and every few days, to honour the people who are dying in the world, I will catch the night news.  I won’t listen to the politicians who have lied to us, and I won’t engage in arguments…in theory.  I see this as a way to stop the attacks.  Because, look, our lives are precious.  If we concentrate on being kind to one another, and if we strive to create beauty in everything, laughter in everyone we meet, peace in our homes: perhaps we can counter the madness.

Deja vu

This week, I was moved to get my hair cut.  I say ‘I was moved’ because it came upon me as a directive, rather than a choice.  My hair looked fine. I like my hair. It’s curly and a little wild.  But watching an episode of ‘Friends’ with my two teenaged daughters caused hair angst.  Or so I thought.  I looked in the mirror, thought – hey, let’s get a fringe and some layers, so that when it grows, it grows into something nice.  I got an appointment with my favourite hairdresser, Graham.  I get my hair cut every two years.  We’ve known each other for about fourteen years, so we spend the haircut touching on family and kids, but mainly talking existentially.  When I walked in, he said – ‘Your hair always looks so great, I often wonder why we’re cutting it.  Why don’t we just have a cup of tea and a chat?’  Which was nice.  But no, I was determined this was happening, and so it happened, and I looked a bit different.  We talked about the balancing properties of learning the piano, and I gave him tips on the flexing of those new muscles he was developing in his brain.

Yesterday, I got dressed in my teal skirt and black jumper and went off to Bristol for the day.  On returning home, I clicked onto Facebook, which flagged up a memory from two years ago.  It was a photo of me wearing my teal skirt and black jumper, showing off my new haircut.  I found it amusing, and posted about it on Facebook, completing a pretty lame circle.  This morning I woke up and thought – I must go to Cirencester today.  I’ve no reason to go to Cirencester.  I am concerned that I am now being ruled by an uber brain which is telling me to do things because it assumes that my life has a seasonal quality.  Don’t move forward, it is saying.  Sit within your lane of routine.

And I hate that.

Because I come from a family of immigrants, I feel that movement and change equals success.  Unless we are challenging ourselves to be in new places, how are we to see the world in a new way?  Unless we cut our hair off, how are we to see renewal and growth?  Unless we spend time in new environments, watching new people, interacting with them, learning their language and their ideas, how are we to challenge the old ways we thought and our parents and grandparents thought?  And how will the world evolve into the best place it can be?

All of this swirled around within me, making me anxious and unhappy this week.  Should we sell the house and move on?  What am I doing with my life? How can I counteract the rise of the far right and the movement toward jingoism and hatred within my own little sphere?  And then, I got myself a new habit.  I took myself off every evening at around 6pm, lay on my bedroom floor and meditated for half an hour.  Brain balancing, I realised, was what I needed.  My brain was sending me a very clear message: it wasn’t saying ‘you’re stuck in a routine’.  It was saying: ‘you’re not listening to me enough.’   In clicking through to Facebook/Twitter – the internet, in fact – routinely, instead of doing what I used to do: pick up the phone and call a friend, or turn on the radio and listen to a show I liked at the time it was on rather than catching up on iPlayer, or writing a letter to someone, or reading an article in a magazine, or reading a chapter of the book I’m so looking forward to getting back to in my last twenty minutes before sleep, I’ve been clicking through to read a lot of news, a lot of people’s opinions, a lot about the nonsense of people’s lives.  It engenders a feeling of not being quite here.  I’ve not been quite here for a while.

Meditation every night for a week has caused all sorts of things to come into focus.  November has brought sadness.  I cry at the slightest thing: this morning, I sobbed when Radio 3 played Willard White singing Aaron Copland’s song ‘Simple Gifts’ for Thanksgiving.  The words are stunning:

Tis the gift to be simple, ’tis the gift to be free,

‘Tis the gift to come down where we ought to be,

And when we find ourselves in the place just right,

‘Twill be in the valley of love and delight.

When true simplicity is gain’d

To bow and to bend we shan’t be asham’d,

To turn, turn will be our delight

‘Till by turning, turning we come round right.

The music is the music to the hymn ‘Lord of the Dance’.  It made me miss my father -it was one of his favourites.  It made me miss everyone.  Everyone I’ve ever known.  I missed the people I know now – I missed the aspects of my children lost to time.  Grown ups sit at my table, and I miss their childlike responses to everything.  I missed my birth family and the friendships of childhood, and the people who lived on our street who were old and the teachers and the friends and yes, everyone.  
Perhaps my uber brain is a wise old thing.  Perhaps I’m living in the valley of love and delight now.  Perhaps when I’ve changed it all in six months or a year, or two years, or five years, I will look at this time, now, and think – oh, we had it so good.  But, here’s the thing: hair grows.  Life grows.  We move on and we change and we live our lives in stages, incrementally.  That is the truth of us.  It is the turning – to turn, turn – that is the delight.  By turning, turning we come out right.

Brave old world

We’re in the era of Trump.  We’re in a moment, that moment we can breathe in, before we jump into a new, strange world.  Post referendum, we’re in that moment in Britain.  Waiting until we jump.

It’s actually an OK place to be.  It’s a place where we can understand how we feel.  We can regroup. We can make personal structural policy about how we go forward.  Becoming old has given me a sense of the world that is so very different from the world twenty somethings see, or thirty somethings, or even forty somethings.  I look at Trump and think – I’ve seen it all before.

Yes, he has risen on a tide of rightwing populism after an austerity crisis: a trope taught for seventy years to anyone who scratched their heads in wonderment at the rise of a Chaplin lookalike with a funny moustache.  Why didn’t the Jews rise up? is another question we all asked when we were kids. And, look.  Look at the ‘Day One’ posts.  Women being texted by their mothers to please not wear their Hijab, swastikas on walls, the liberal use of the ‘n’ word in graffiti, women being sexually harassed because that’s the behaviour the President elect has modelled.  Yes, people are being silenced, and are worried about their resistance.  But this is a world where we watch each other.  This is a world where – for every moment of propaganda from the candidate, there is a moment countering it.  For every vile media outlet – the Daily Mail – spewing their poisonous fumes, there is another shouting them down.

I remain optimistic about the world.  I’ve seen it all before.  Trump is Reagan.  I remember my bitter anger about the two term Reagan.  I remember the getting up at the crack of sparrows to march the streets of London against him and Mrs Thatcher.  If I look back at him now – well, hindsight is a marvellous thing. He seems fairly benign.  He seems as damaging as the movies he made in the 1950s.  A small frisson in a history book.  A laughable oaf of a man.  He seems now, to be nothing more than a dyed hairdo with an ambitious wife.  Toward the end of his second term, there were rumours that his wife’s astrologer was making the major policy decisions for the United States, and that, my friends is what I remember of Reagan.

Trump, similarly to Reagan, will surround himself with people who will try to push through his agenda in the first years of his first term in office, and on finding that the excesses are impossible, he will learn on the job, perhaps grow up with the strain of actually having to do something serious, and become a moderate.  This will anger his more virulent supporters who may not even vote him in for a second term.  He will split the GOP, and they won’t recover for at least a decade.  From my mouth to God’s ears, right?

Meanwhile, we will all continue to live in our brave old world.  The great thing about extremism is – it brings people together.  It is a catalyst which causes activity.  On Saturday night, we went to see Hassan Akkad speak in Stroud.  He is a Syrian refugee, who fled his country after being tortured in prison for protesting against the regime.  A production team gave him a Go Pro camera to film his journey.  On the same camera my 15 year old daughter used to film us jumping off rocks in the Med, Hassan filmed himself take the journey from Turkey to Greece, in a flimsy boat which failed and began to let water in.  The films he made of his journey were then edited into the TV series ‘Exodus’ which was aired earlier this year on the BBC.  If you haven’t watched it, I urge you to.  It is perhaps the finest TV I have seen this year.  It is immediate, and effective in its ability to churn up our own thoughts and attitudes.  It asks us to understand our attitudes to the refugee crisis, and to our fellow man.

I remember thinking – what is this articulate, good looking, finely boned, moral person doing in the Jungle?  What is this guy even doing getting on and off boats in the Med, fighting to get to Britain?  I remember thinking – to my horror and shame – why does he need to come to Britain: surely he can find a way to live in Syria?  The kick is in the tail end of the show.  Watch it to the end.  I cried – sobbed, in fact.  I won’t spoil it for you.  But there he was on Saturday night, answering our questions.  He said this truth that he seems to have stumbled upon, during his journey.  A guy at the front asked a convoluted question about Trump and hatred – he asked Hassan this question, and I thought – what can he imagine the poor guy will say? – I mean, he’s 28 or something.  But his reply was brilliant.  He said: ‘It’s all about telling stories.  That is how to fight hatred.’

The Daily Mail spews the poisonous fumes – but if you follow that metaphor through, they are driving their vehicle into oblivion.  Their stories are biased and untrue.  People – the majority of the people – like true stories.  They buy truth of emotion, truth of a moment.  They don’t buy manufactured story.  The Hollywood movies that sell are not always the ones whose producers have spent millions on.  I mean, I’m sure the millions help.  ‘I, Daniel Blake’ was packing out audiences across the UK in October.  A film about a brave, small man fighting a labyrinthine system, struck deep and beat many more expensive movies.

We must keep telling our stories.  It is incumbent upon us to reach out and understand the stories, to read them, to retell them to each other. It is morally important for us all, and for our brave old world.  If we can tell the stories with a smile on our faces, all the better.  If we can laugh – well, we’ve won.  We are here. Breathe in. Tell the stories. Laugh. Carry on…

Synchronicity

This morning’s breakfast has been full of examples of artists demonstrating the notion of synchronicity.  That combination of practice of their art – Gladwell’s 10,000 hours – and the effortless confluence of the artists’ spirit: a demonic work ethic driven by a need to complete a project they completely believe in, and then the sitting back and not recognising what they have achieved: because it is simply beyond what they had imagined they could do.

We had music on shuffle, so the Beach Boys and the Beatles came through – ‘Sloop John B’ and ‘Ticket to Ride’.  These were 10,000-hours-songs, artists demonstrating their craft.  And then ‘Good Vibrations’ played, and ‘Back in the USSR’.  The playlist went through Dylan, Hendrix, Presley, the Kinks, Clapton, and landed on Frank Sinatra, singing ‘Strangers in the Night’.  This is where I was struck deepest.  I read recently about how Sinatra made the recording of this song.  He sang, with a full orchestra in a studio, doing take after take until perfection was reached.  Yet, that two minute and thirty six second song sounds so effortless.  It sounds like we imagine it – he stood up in a crowded, dark bar, walked to the microphone cigarette in hand, and just sang it.

Dylan’s ‘Just Like a Woman’, sung acoustically in front of an audience is a different example.  It is strangely dull, yet also meditative to the point of hypnotic.  It is a demonstration of what I am trying to understand in my own work.  That confluence – the moment when you practice and practice your art – writing, drawing, playing, singing – and then there is an interchange, and you become the work, and the work becomes you.  That is what I understand when I hear these people, and what I want to achieve.  It is what I am worried about – that I am not achieving it at the moment.

Because there has to be a drive forward, when you work.  There has to be a reason for doing it.  We all want to be rich, apparently. We all want to be famous.  This is what the zeitgeist seems to be telling us.  The Presidential election driving us insane with worry and desire for something beyond our control, the Brexit armies on either side of this chasm driven into our daily lives, the refugee crisis catapulted onto us by wars our governments created: they are all magnified in the way we receive our news, hour by hour, day by day, week by week.  The voters vote for the most raggedly popular liar, and half of us give up and hold our faces in our palms, trying not to catch a glimpse of the ugly light through our clenched fingers.

But we used to sit in sunny rooms and read.  We used to put music on the record player and darn our torn jeans.  We used to listen and think.  We used to do our best for the people who needed us – marching with placards, shaking buckets to raise money.  We used to do things collectively because we are people who cannot exist without each other.

My art is writing.  My art has upset me more than anything in the past ten years because my art has followed the free market enterprise by demanding success, and demanding a structure that is reliant on a single hero’s journey.  If you don’t know what the hero’s journey is, look up Joseph Campbell.  This is the nutshell of it: apart from maybe three cultures in our enormous world, every myth, every story – novel, film, play – fits into the simple structure of the Hero’s Journey.  A Hobbit, say, or Dorothy Judy Garland, set off on a journey – reluctantly.  They are forced into this by events larger than themselves – an authoritarian figure summons them for this purpose – and off they go, into the magical world of Oz or some other kingdom thereof.  They face adversities – yada yada yada, I won’t tell you it all – but all the time, all the time, they realise that – ‘there’s no place like home’.  They spend a long time realising this, so that they can come back to their lives again, changed, better for purpose, hungry for life.  It probably takes them 10,000 hours to get there.  You see where I’m going with this?  Along the way, they have many friends who help them, but you see, the reason why I’m pissed off with this structure is: they don’t work collectively.  No.  The friends encountered, work toward the hero’s success.

This is where we’re at, politically and artistically.  Trump and Clinton are products of a system – the free market – which says: singular journey good, collective journey – Marxism.  (And that’s bad, ok?)  But if that is bad, what happens to our world?  Already a handful of billionaires control the money.  Already natives are driven off their homelands for the sport of the rich people.

Art.  Frank Sinatra recorded and recorded that song and we just think of Frank, standing there in the spotlight, singing to us, the singular person in the audience.  But that song is violins soaring.  It is the producer who spliced together the various takes of Frank’s already strained voice.  It is a collective moment of genius.  Trump’s path is strewn with people he has defeated by grabbing them in areas he shouldn’t have, people he has thrust a sword into willy nilly, and he hasn’t ever completed the journey – just gone back to the beginning, over and over, because he hasn’t learned.  He hasn’t understood the traditional way of growing: he has not grown up, or gained wisdom.  He has stayed 13 while growing older.  Clinton has wisdom, but is part of a hero’s journey that is far more complex –  she must wilfully make this journey about herself, a singular hero, in order to achieve the goal of being President.

And isn’t that the problem and the point and ultimately the tragedy of the human being, and the democratic system?  We must work those 10,000 hours to learn our craft.  We must give ourselves to our art.  But then, we must thrust forward onto the pathway of the world, selling of ourselves.  Our art and ourselves conflate and change each other, and then people buy into our system.  Because that is what pays us, that is how we eat and how we live.  I don’t know what I am selling.  I don’t know how to be in a world where I sell of myself – I’ve tried to do it, and I’ve failed, because I don’t really believe in a system where I walk to a mic and pretend I did it all by myself.

I guess I will turn my record player on, turn it up, and play that other Frank Sinatra song, which came on just as I was writing this: ‘That’s Life’.  When she was six, my 24 year old daughter was asked to a popular girl’s party.  Isobel had always been the kid in the corner in class, the one who played imaginary games and read books.  It was a karaoke party, so she wanted to go, because she’s always liked to sing.  I left her in a large, oak lined house in Beckenham, with trepidation.  Three hours later, I was greeted at the door by the mother:

‘Your Isobel has had us up, dancing in the aisles…’

‘What did she sing? SClub7?’

‘She did a perfect – ‘That’s Life’.  Perfect…’ the mother said, laughing.

It sort of sums her up, really.  The quiet girl, the shy one, part of a large family, who seemed to be the arms who caught things when they fell from cots, who smiled when I felt defeated, who came in every day from school, every day, and made me a cup of tea.  When you’re despairing, put Frank on the record player, and take your face out of the palms of your hands, and when you think you’re going to cry this Wednesday, sing along instead.  Because guaranteed, although you despair of your place in the world full of singular heroes, you will understand yourself within it all.

You have to pick yourself up.  And get back in the race.

 

Throwing cups

I was never very good at sport.  I had flat feet and asthma.  When I was first diagnosed – at the age of four – there were no easy solutions.  If you couldn’t breathe, you’d lie down.  Plastic, streamlined puffers were a thing of the future.  When I was a little older, there were inhalers with plastic capsules that were pressed with inbuilt needles, so that you could inhale the powder inside.  For a six year old, it was yucky.  I didn’t like doing it, so I think I tried my best to avoid it.  I spent a lot of my childhood in bed, reading, and watching clouds scud past the windows.

I never thought running was something I would want to do.  My sisters were captains of many sports teams, my father a Marathon runner, my mother a sprinter in her youth.  I was the odd one out, and of course, in a family of characters, I was happy to be the quiet reader.  Now though, at fifty years old, six months teetotal, vegan, gluten and sugar free (I’m taking middle age seriously, and the fact that I am of south east Asian descent, which means diabetes is almost inevitable, if I don’t make these changes) – I am a runner.  Three times a week, I go out onto the cycle track and run 5 miles quite fast.  This morning, I did it in an hour, which isn’t great by anyone else’s standards, but by mine – it’s fantastic.  It’s more than fantastic.

Dad started running in his mid forties.  His own father died at the age of 45, and he always had it in his mind that he would need to ward off that hypnotic thought of dying young.  Dad was a funny, dear man, full of laughter and jokes.  He was serious too, and very religious, but he loved to play.  He loved children.  When he was working in the garden, he would call us to make a cup of tea, and we would take it out in his favourite cup.  A mustard coloured, nondescript seventies mug.  We would stay and chat, and when he finished drinking, the cricketer in him would throw the cup in the air.  Or he’d throw it at us – from a very young age, he would take all three of us out into the garden and throw balls at us, make us dive for the high catches.  I was never any good.  It was almost certainly because I didn’t practise.  You can’t really practise catching if you’re holding the page in your book with one hand.

When I was sixteen, I took the tea out, and had a chat with him, inspecting the flower bed he was digging.  And then he threw the cup, in the air first, catching it himself.  When he pointed it at me, I said ‘Don’t throw it at me!’, but he did anyway, and I turned away.  I turned away.  I can’t tell you why. But I keep seeing that turn away, today.   The mug smashing on the rockery.

Time is finite.  We cannot do everything.  I really thought, for a long time, that I actually  could do everything I wanted.  I have a limited pallet of choices.  A palate, if you will.  I like to write. I like to draw.  I like children.  I thought I could do everything within those loves.  It is proving harder than I imagined.  When I’m out with people who have just done a whole degree in illustrating, I am fascinated and a little alarmed that they draw and draw.  They sit down, and pen goes to paper, and there you have it, amazing artworks are created while I scrabble about with pencils and staring and deciding on framing and so on.  It’s like lying in bed and looking at the sky: it’s fascinating, but at some point, you have to get up and do.  You have to catch the cup.  You have to draw.

I told myself this the other day: cut yourself a break.  Be compassionate to the child you were.  You were sick. You didn’t have the practise to catch the cup.  Practise is all it takes.  So I started drawing this week.  I started completing projects.  I started running faster.  I used new pens, new techniques.  I learned to land on the balls of my feet.  I learned to play with colour.  I learned that – hey, if time is finite, chucking a cup in the air, or at someone, hoping they’ll catch it, is like drawing a picture or telling a story – you’re taking a chance.  Either someone will catch it, or they won’t.  And if they don’t, it’s only a mug.  It’s only a picture.  It’s only a story.  They may be the most important thing in the world, but at least you’re not in bed watching it happen to other people.

Immigrant

I am a sad mummy this morning.  My second child, Isobel, got on a plane to New Zealand yesterday evening.  She is twenty four.  She aims to be there a year, maybe forever, if they will let her.  Three of us waved goodbye to her at the station.  As the train approached, I held her to me and kissed her cheeks over and over, telling her it would be alright, while sobbing from my gut.  She cried too and said ‘I love you’ over and over, and I said it back, and then she got on the train and waved from the window.  Fifteen year old daughter said ‘Someone should run down the platform…’ and then she did.  We waved as Isobel waved from the window.

And then we went off and got on with the rest of our days – I bought food, made it, ate it, went out to a committee meeting.  All the time,  a small half of me was on the train, then on the bus, then sitting at Heathrow with my child.  This baby, toddler and child who the younger children didn’t know.  That’s the thing with large families: the older two had a space in their parents’ lives that was exclusively theirs.

They were babies when we were babies: I had Isobel when I was 26, I had her elder brother Ed when I was her age.  We were off-hand, busy parents, always marching on to achieve…what we have now.  When I sat on the floor with Ed and Isobel, it was in a chaotic household in south east London, and when we went out for walks, it was to tiny playgrounds.  We ate sparingly and saved up for shoes, for treats, for toys.  Our closeness is a strange clairvoyance: they learned to read the minds of people who were always flying by the seat of their pants, while assuring their tiny wards, carried on their shoulders – that everything was fine.  Fine, fine, fine.  Isobel became someone who seemed to understand undercurrents of emotion better than words.  She always giggled, Tom remembers, was always smiling, as if assuring us that yes, it would be fine.

I came back from the committee meeting through the rainy, unlit, winding country roads, feeling like a failure.  It is a totally undeserved moniker, but as a mother, the instinct is to keep your young near to you for as long as possible.  As a modern, feminist human being, my tendency has been to usher the children out into the world – claim your place within it, we have always said.  I sat and looked at Isobel’s baby album.  What a shame we didn’t look at it together, when she was here.  What a shame Tom didn’t sit on one side of her, and I on the other, and she in the middle, holding the album, turning the pages, the way it would have happened in one of those terrible movies they seem to make for the 3.30pm audience of Channel 5.  I sat and cried, looking at all the grandparents taking turns to hold her after she was born: three of them gone.  With them, they have taken collective memory, and it is a loss.

This morning, I thought about my grandmother – my father’s mother – who had five children.  Two girls and three boys.  My father was her fourth child: when he was twelve, his father died.  He and his brothers were sent to boarding school.  All three, in their twenties, got on a boat from Colombo, Sri Lanka and travelled to the UK, to seek their fortunes.  It is so  very hard to let go of your child, when you’re holding them and they’re crying and you’re crying, and they used to live inside you, and you carried them and loved them and supported them, like an addictive habit. How did my grandmother let go of three children?  How will I let go of four?

And yet, I will.  Because from those four children in the world, will come permutations of culture and happiness that I can only guess at now.  We went to Beirut in the Easter break.  Two or three shops carried a small advert for a horse shampoo called Mane’n Tail.  I scoured the streets of Beirut for horses.  There were none.  There were, however, a majority of women with the most gloriously thick and heavy, dark hair swaying across their backs in the sea salt stung breeze.  I ordered Mane’n Tail shampoo and conditioner from Amazon on my return, and use nothing else.  I am alien to myself a lot of the time, because I was born and brought up in London, and ate British food (yes, that means curry most weekends) and drank British drinks.  Thanks to the hipster culture, I have more coconut oil and coconut water in my diet, and feel more at home with it than I do with red wine – it is, after all, the main export of Sri Lanka.

Being an immigrant means the moving forward, the adapting to change, adapting to a different geography.  It also means you are a magpie.  You are someone who is always looking at the best all cultures can give to you.  Last weekend, the four children lived in our house again, for three nights, revelling in each other’s company, listening to the music of their childhood, reading the books they collectively loved: Asterix books mainly.  I made the foods they love – chicken curry and yellow rice, dhal, salads, and 15 year old made the Nigella chocolate cake that every feast finishes with.  We sat in front of the fire and nattered.  On Sunday, we took our Christmas walk with the dogs.  I imagined that in a year or two, there will be additional people with the four, creating new permutations of our family, enhancing our culture, challenging us and making us move forward.  We will travel to their new found worlds, and we will change and adapt and become better.  Forward is the only way.